🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a big but very loyal friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have been caught in a tussle between a closed attraction, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those working directly with the whales say the heated controversy over their destiny often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who work with them regularly.

After the national authorities disallowed the export of the belugas to China, the controversial facility near Niagara Falls where they are housed stated it would consider to put them down unless the authorities covers the expense of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that request, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Experts say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and communal behavior point to they are highly cognitive mammals – something one caretaker discovered directly.

Burgess spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a job that involved gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.

“Building up those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was even so astounded by the nuances and quirks in their dispositions. She cultivated a particular love for two female belugas with contrasting temperaments.

“Eve selected me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Each transformed the way I view connection.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s relationship with the whales developed against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their captivity.

During her three years at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, passed away. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility links to natural mortality, but which campaigners say indicates the inadequate care in which they were kept.

The facility did not open to the public over the recent season, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand results of the cessation. “Structural materials is breaking off from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not comment to a request for comment, but previously asserted: “The whales … obtain far higher quality medical attention and constant attention than any person in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in recent months following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the park believed particulars of the incident were disclosed to the media and she was released soon after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and other caretakers in distress. She says the park’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any efforts to put down even a individual beluga would require “considerable manpower”, vehicles and specialized tools.

“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She backs requests for the whales to be removed promptly from the park, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.

In late September, Canada’s government official denied a request to transfer the whales to China.

“Granting the application would have meant a perpetual life in enclosure and a return to public entertainment,” the minister commented. “As society, we know that whales should be in the sea, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing permit an transfer that would continue the conditions these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the official’s comments indicate a wider incorrect perception of the circumstances of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As officials struggle to find a answer, ideas have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for Indigenous peoples.

A suggested refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which now received regulatory clearance, has proven highly debated. The planned location, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain positive that it could in time represent a permanent resolution for some of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “only an experiment” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the possibility of a protected habitat represents a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a viable plan in the coming months.

An official, leader of the plan, said the site will mimic the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive area. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|